微博

ECO中文网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

ECO中文网 门户 优秀译文推荐 欧洲 查看内容

[2010.11.11] 跟着感觉走

2010-11-18 12:32| 发布者: lilywizardry| 查看: 3145| 评论: 6|原作者: dqzxf

摘要: 报废“鹞”式战机的计划似乎有错,原因何在?

057 Britain - A row over defence.mp3

本文由译者 dqzxf 提供 点击此处阅读双语版


关于防务问题的一场争论


跟着感觉走


报废“鹞”式战机的计划似乎有错,原因何在?

2010年11月11日





尽管上个月发布的《战略防务和安全评估报告》令人感到痛苦,受到未来四年内削减7.5%军事预算影响的大多数人只能自认倒霉,行个军礼,该干嘛就接着干嘛吧。但有一件事是个例外:安全评估报告发布后,很多人对报废80架“鹞”式垂直起降战机和“皇家方舟”号航母,但保留皇家空军的“旋风”式战机的计划一直是满腔怒火。这项决定使皇家海军在2020年两艘新航母中的一艘进入现役前没有能够携载战机的航母可供使用。11月10日,两个前第一海军军务大臣和其他退休将领发表的一封公开信刊载在《泰晤士报》上,认为这一决定是“危险的”,取消这项决定是“压倒一切的国家利益”。这封公开信使争论暴露于众。



这封信件表达了许多军官(海军和陆军将领们)对此事的看法。他们的看法似乎似乎可以归纳为:首先,直到周末发布这项评估报告之前,决定报废的是130架“旋风”式战机,而不是“鹞”式。其次,英国应该立即采取行动,只保留两种类型的喷气战机(皇家空军还有“台风”式战机)而不是三种,对此没有异议。而在未来两年内使“旋风”式战机退役的方案对国防实力损害最小,但最大限度地节约了经费。最后,一旦决定在建的两艘新航母中至少保留一艘,那种认为英国可以在十年的时间内有航母而没有舰载机的想法简直不可理喻。


《防务分析》是一家通讯简报,据该报的弗朗西斯•图萨(Francis Tusa )估计,将维修费用要高得多的“旋风式”战机退役而保留下“鹞”式战机,此举就可以节省40~50亿英镑,而将“皇家方舟”号留在现役内其费用大约每年只需1.2亿英镑。他补充说,十年时间内都没有具有作战能力的航母可用意味着英军将失去至关重要的战斗能力。其他人,包括这封公开信的作者都担心“航母缺口”将使英国失去独立实施远距作战的能力。他们说,如此一来,像福克兰群岛一类的地方(以及这些地方珍贵的油田)就很容易受到攻击。


新成立的国家安全委员会经验不足,在最后一刻使他们改变主意的似乎是空军声称在阿富汗“旋风式”战机比“鹞”式战机的作战效率要高。在阿富汗作战飞机的数量绰绰有余,但令人奇怪的是,这里的情况居然会被作为支持空军观点的证据。在作战范围、有效载荷、飞行速度和打击移动目标的能力等方面,“旋风”式战机无疑要胜出一筹。但另一方面,“鹞”式战机可以在各种临时场所起降,灵活性更高,可靠性也更强,很容易就可以加装“旋风”式战机携带的先进的“硫磺”(Brimstone)反坦克导弹。在阿富汗一年中有5个月气候炎热,此时“旋风”式战机就只能携载与“鹞”式战机相同的武器升空。


皇家空军对“旋风”式战机的热情是可以理解的。首先,“旋风”式战机不用与海军分享(而“鹞”式战机则属于联合打击联队);其次这种飞机需要的机组人员更多一些(这样一来就可以为空军留住更多的编制名额)。图萨先生提出了一个合理的折中方案,按照这个方案实施仍可以节省数十亿英镑:一是要淘汰掉一半的“旋风”式战机,但留下60架直到阿富汗不再需要;二要保留20架“鹞”式战机搭载在航母上,直至2020年由新机型替代;最后,要加快攻击性“台风”战机的部署。现在正是重新考虑这一问题的时刻。




鲜花

握手

雷人
1

路过

鸡蛋

刚表态过的朋友 (1 人)

发表评论

最新评论

引用 dqzxf 2010-11-18 06:47
本帖最后由 dqzxf 于 2010-11-18 07:00 编辑

注释1:The seat of their pants

这个标题来自惯用语 fly by the seat of their pants

An early aviation expression meaning 'to act based on instinct and perceptions rather than following a planned course of action; to make things up as one goes.' It seems that the phrase was first written as fly by the seat of his trousers, which sets its origins in the British Isles. A 1938 American newspaper article on the cross-Atlantic flight of Douglas Corrigan lists this wording as an older phrase and instead calls the pilot a fly by the seat of his pants aviator because he flew without the use of any instruments.

pants是裤子,而seat在这儿是指裤子接触座位的部分。也就是裤子的臀部。飞行员的裤子当然不能指点他的航向,fly by the seat of one's pants其实是说他在茫无依据的情况下只得凭直觉猜测座下的飞机该往哪儿开。

如果是完整的习语,似乎应该译作“跟着感觉飞”。但本标题省略了fly,就正好套用汉语的常用语“跟着感觉走”。这个标体与副标题是一问一答的对应关系,也就是说英国政府让“鹞”式战机退役的计划未经深思熟虑。
引用 migmig 2010-11-18 07:11
本帖最后由 migmig 于 2010-11-18 07:12 编辑

回复 dqzxf 的帖子

《泰晤士》报
《泰晤士报》?搜了下,貌似后边这种在官方网站更普遍些,当然,这是吹毛求疵。

但最大限度的节约了经费。
但最大限度地节约了经费。
引用 dqzxf 2010-11-18 10:16
回复 migmig 的帖子

呵呵,谢谢。
引用 dqzxf 2010-11-18 17:01
注释2:Joint Strike Wing

下面是来自维基百科的资料:
Joint Strike Wing, previously known as Joint Force Harrier, is the British military formation which controls the STOVL Harrier aircraft of the Royal Air Force and Fleet Air Arm. It is sub-ordinate to RAF Air Command.
As of April 2010[update] there are two operational Joint Strike Wing squadrons, one Fleet Air Arm and one Royal Air Force, plus an RAF Operational Conversion Unit.
History
Joint Force Harrier was established on 1 April 2000 in response to the proposal brought by the British Government as part of Strategic Defence Review. Originally called Joint Force 2000, it combined the Royal Navy's Sea Harrier FA2 squadrons with the RAF's Harrier GR 7/7A squadrons under a single command structure within RAF Strike Command. This force was to be deployable from both Invincible-class aircraft carriers, Royal Air Force stations and deployed air bases.

Harrier GR9 of No. 20 Squadron RAF


The Royal Navy's contribution to the force was the Sea Harrier previously part of Naval Air Command. With the retirement of the Sea Harrier in 2006, the force migrated entirely to the Harrier GR7, and the upgraded GR9.
In 2006, No 3 Squadron converted to the Eurofighter Typhoon, surrendering its aircraft to the Fleet Air Arm, and allowing No 800 NAS to reform. At the same time, the size of operational squadrons reduced from 12 aircraft to nine. Both No 1 and No 4 Squadrons, together with 800 NAS, surrendered three aircraft each.[citation needed] This allowed 801 NAS to convert from the Sea Harrier to the Harrier GR9. The Naval Air Squadrons operate but not own the aircraft.
On 9 March 2007, with the reformation of 801 NAS, the Naval Strike Wing (NSW) was formed. This saw elements of both Fleet Air Arm squadrons amalgamate into a single operational squadron for deployment either on land (such as Afghanistan) or aboard the Royal Navy's two aircraft carriers (HMS Illustrious & HMS Ark Royal)[1] On 1 April 2010, NSW reverted to the identity of 800 Naval Air Squadron.[2]
On 31 March 2010, the force was reduced by one squadron with the disbandment of No. 20 Squadron RAF, the Harrier Operational Conversion Unit (OCU). No. 4 Squadron also disbanded and reformed as No. 4 (Reserve) Squadron at RAF Wittering, taking over as the OCU.[3] At the same time, Joint Force Harrier was renamed Joint Strike Wing and all remaining Harrier GR7 aircraft were retired.[4]
Until 2010, it was intended that the Harrier GR9 fleet would be replaced by 138 STOVL-capable F-35B Lightning II aircraft around 2018.[5] However, on 19 October 2010, as part of the UK government's Strategic Defence and Security Review, it was announced that the Harrier was to be retired by April 2011. It is now expected to be replaced by a smaller number of non-STOVL F-35C Lightning IIs. These are scheduled to be introduced by 2020, when a CATOBAR-capable CVF aircraft carrier enters service.[6]
Joint Strike Wing units
As of April 2010[update]
引用 dickon1221 2010-11-18 22:38
最后一句话最好加上个“了”字,这样才完整。
引用 dqzxf 2010-12-13 19:18
回复 dickon1221 的帖子

谢谢,改过了。

查看全部评论(6)

QQ|小黑屋|手机版|网站地图|关于我们|ECO中文网 ( 京ICP备06039041号  

GMT+8, 2024-9-8 07:50 , Processed in 0.966880 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.3

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部